-
If \( \overrightarrow{r} = x \overrightarrow{i} + y \overrightarrow{j} + z \overrightarrow{k} \), then \( \text{div} \overrightarrow{r} = \)
- 3
- 0
- \( \overrightarrow{r}/r \)
- \( \overrightarrow{r}/r^2 \)
-
If \( \phi = xyz \), then the maximum directional derivative of \( \phi \) at (1,1,1) is
- 3
- \( \sqrt{3} \)
- 2
- 0
-
If \( \overrightarrow{r} = x \overrightarrow{i} + y \overrightarrow{j} + z \overrightarrow{k} \) and \( a \) is a constant vector, then \( \nabla(a \cdot r) = \)
- 0
- 3
- \( \overrightarrow{a} \)
- \( \overrightarrow{r} \)
-
If \( \phi = x^2 + y^2 + z \), then the directional derivative of \( \phi \) at (1,0,1) in the direction of \( \overrightarrow{a} = \overrightarrow{i} + \overrightarrow{j} + \overrightarrow{k} \) is
- 2
- 3
- \( 1/\sqrt{3} \)
- \( \sqrt{3} \)
-
If \( \phi = x^2 y + y^2 + z \), then unit normal vector of \( \phi \) at (2,1,1) is
- \( (2i + 2j + k)/3 \)
- \( (4i + 6j + k)/\sqrt{53} \)
- \( (3i + j + k)/\sqrt{21} \)
- \( (2i + 3j + 4k)/\sqrt{29} \)
-
If \( r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2} \), then \( \nabla \left( \frac{1}{r} \right) = \)
- \( \vec{r}/r^3 \)
- \( -\vec{r}/r^3 \)
- \( \vec{r}/r^2 \)
- \( -\vec{r}/r^2 \)
-
If \( \vec{r} = x\vec{i} + y\vec{j} + z\vec{k} \), then \( \nabla \times \vec{r} = \)
- 0
- 3
- \( \vec{r} \)
- \( \vec{r} \)
-
If \( \phi \) is a scalar point function, then \( \text{curl}(\text{grad}\,\phi) = \)
- 0
- 0
- \( \nabla \phi \)
- 1
-
If \( r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2} \), then \( \nabla (\log r) = \)
- \( \frac{\vec{r}}{r^2} \)
- \( \frac{\vec{r}}{r} \)
- \( \frac{1}{r^2} \)
- \( -\frac{\vec{r}}{r^2} \)
-
If \( \hat{A} = (5x + y)\hat{i} + (cy - z)\hat{j} + (3x - 7z)\hat{k} \) is solenoidal, then \( c = \)
- 3
- 0
- 1
- 2
-
If \( \vec{A} \) is a vector point function, then \( \text{div}(\text{curl} \, \vec{A}) = \)
- 2
- 1
- 0
- 0
-
\( \nabla (r^n) = \)
- \( nr^{n-1} \, \hat{r} \)
- \( nr^{n-2} \)
- \( nr^{n-2} \, \hat{r} \)
- \( nr^{n-1} \)
-
The directional derivative of \( f = x + y + z \) in the direction of \( \vec{a} = \vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k} \) at (1,1,1) is
- 2
- 3
- \( 1/\sqrt{3} \)
- \( \sqrt{3} \)
-
If \( \phi = xyz \), then unit normal vector of \( \phi \) at (1,2,-1) is
- \( (-2\vec{i}-\vec{j}+2\vec{k})/3 \)
- \( (4\vec{i}+6\vec{j}+\vec{k})/\sqrt{53} \)
- \( (3\vec{i}+\vec{j}+\vec{k})/\sqrt{11} \)
- \( (-2\vec{i}+3\vec{j}+2\vec{k})/\sqrt{17} \)
-
If \( \vec{F} = (x+y) \, \vec{i} + \vec{j} - (x+y) \, \vec{k} \), then \( \vec{F} \cdot \text{curl} \, \vec{F} = \)
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
\( \nabla [f(r)] = \)
- \( f'(r) \hat{r} \)
- \( f'(r) \)
- \( f'(r) \vec{r} \)
- \( \hat{r} \)
-
\( \text{grad}(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) \) at (1,1,1) is
- \( \vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k} \)
- \( 2\vec{i} + 2\vec{j} + 2\vec{k} \)
- \( \vec{i} + 2\vec{j} + \vec{k} \)
- \( 2\vec{i} + 3\vec{j} + 4\vec{k} \)
-
The greatest rate of increase of \( \phi = x^2 yz^3 \) at (2,1,1) is
- \( \sqrt{11} \)
- \( 2\sqrt{11} \)
- \( 3\sqrt{11} \)
- \( 4\sqrt{11} \)
-
The total work done by a force \( \vec{F} = 2xy\vec{i} - 4z\vec{j} + 3x\vec{k} \) along \( C : x = t^2, y = 2t + 1, z = t^3 \) from \( t = 1 \) to \( t = 2 \) is
- \( 125/8 \)
- \( 247/12 \)
- \( 517/16 \)
- \( 638/5 \)
-
The scalar potential of \( \vec{F} = y^2\vec{i} + (2xy + z^2)\vec{j} + 2yz\vec{k} \) is
- \( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \)
- \( xyz \)
- \( xy^2 + yz^2 \)
- \( xy + yz + zx \)
-
The cosine of angle between the surfaces \( xy^2z = 3x + z^2 \) and \( 3x^2 - y^2 + 2z = 1 \) at (1, -2, 1)
- \( -\frac{3}{7\sqrt{6}} \)
- \( -\frac{1}{2\sqrt{7}} \)
- \( \frac{3}{7\sqrt{6}} \)
- \( \frac{1}{2\sqrt{7}} \)
-
If \( \overrightarrow{F} = \nabla(x^3 + y^3 + z^3 - 3xyz) \), then \( \text{div}\,\overrightarrow{F} = \)
- \( 3(x + y + z) \)
- \( 6(x + y + z) \)
- \( 6(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) \)
- 0
-
If \( \phi = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 3xyz \), then \( \nabla \times (\nabla\phi) = \)
- \( \overrightarrow{0} \)
- \( 6(x + y + z) \)
- \( x - y - z \)
- \( x - y \)
-
If \( \phi = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 3xyz \), then \( \nabla \cdot (\nabla\phi) = \)
- \( \overrightarrow{0} \)
- \( 6(x + y + z) \)
- \( x - y - z \)
- \( x - y \)
-
If \( \overrightarrow{r} = x\overrightarrow{i} + y\overrightarrow{j} + z\overrightarrow{k} \), then \( \nabla \times \overrightarrow{r} = \)
- \( 0 \)
- \( \overrightarrow{0} \)
- \( 1 \)
- 3
-
If \( \overrightarrow{r} = x\overrightarrow{i} + y\overrightarrow{j} + z\overrightarrow{k} \) and \( r = \|\overrightarrow{r}\| \), then \( \nabla r = \)
- \( \overrightarrow{r}/r \)
- \( \overrightarrow{r} \)
- \( 0 \)
- 1
-
If \( \overrightarrow{a} \) and \( \overrightarrow{b} \) are irrotational, then \( \nabla \cdot (\overrightarrow{a} \times \overrightarrow{b}) = \)
- 4
- 1
- 2
- 0
-
If \( \phi = ax^2 + by^2 + cz^2 \) satisfies Laplace's equation, then \( a + b + c = \)
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
If \( \overrightarrow{F} = x(y + z)\overrightarrow{i} + y(x + z)\overrightarrow{j} + z(x + y)\overrightarrow{k} \), then \( \nabla \cdot \overrightarrow{F} = \)
- \( x + y + z \)
- \( 2(x + y + z) \)
- \( 3(x + y + z) \)
- \( 2(x - y - z) \)
-
If \( u = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \) and \( \overrightarrow{v} = x\overrightarrow{i} + y\overrightarrow{j} + z\overrightarrow{k} \), then \( \nabla \cdot (u\overrightarrow{v}) = \)
- \( u \)
- \( 2u \)
- \( 3u \)
- \( 5u \)
-
\( \nabla \cdot \overrightarrow{r} = \) (where \( \overrightarrow{r} = x\overrightarrow{i} + y\overrightarrow{j} + z\overrightarrow{k} \))
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
\( \nabla \times (\overrightarrow{a} \times \overrightarrow{r}) = \) (where \( \overrightarrow{a} \) is constant)
- \( \overrightarrow{0} \)
- \( \overrightarrow{a} \)
- 2
- 3
-
\( \nabla (\vec{r} \cdot \vec{a}) = \) (where \(\vec{a}\) is constant)
- \( \vec{0} \)
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
If \( \vec{F} = 3x^2 y\vec{i} - 4y\vec{j} + 2zx^2 \vec{k} \), then \( \nabla \cdot \vec{F} \) at (1,1,1) =
- 4
- 6
- 8
- 2
-
If the surfaces \(5x^2 - a y z = 9x\) and \(4x^2 + b z^3 = 4\) cut orthogonally at (1,-1,2), then
- \(a = 2, b = -1\)
- \(a = -2, b = 1\)
- \(a = 2, b = 1\)
- \(a = -2, b = -1\)
-
If \( \vec{F} = 3x^2 y\vec{i} - 4y\vec{j} + 2zx^2 \vec{k} \), then \( \nabla \times \vec{F} \) at (1,1,1) =
- \(4\vec{i} - 4\vec{j} + 2\vec{k}\)
- \(4\vec{i} - 4\vec{j} - 3\vec{k}\)
- \(4\vec{i} - 4\vec{j} + 3\vec{k}\)
- \(4\vec{i} + 4\vec{j} + 3\vec{k}\)
-
If \( \vec{F} = f(x) \vec{i} + g(y) \vec{j} + h(z)\vec{k} \), then \( \vec{F} \) is
- solenoidal
- irrotational
- incompressible
- constant
Explanation: The curl of \( \vec{F} \) will be zero because each component depends only on its respective coordinate, making the field irrotational.
-
If \( \vec{F} = f(y, z) \vec{i} + g(z, x) \vec{j} + h(x, y)\vec{k} \), then \( \vec{F} \) is
- conservative
- irrotational
- constant
- solenoidal
Explanation: The divergence of \( \vec{F} \) will be zero because each component is independent of its own coordinate direction, making the field solenoidal.
-
If \(\vec{F} = x^2 \vec{i} + y^2 \vec{j} + z^2 \vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F}\) at \((1, 1, 1)\) is:
- 2
- 3
- 6
- 0
Explanation: \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2) + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}(y^2) + \frac{\partial}{\partial z}(z^2) = 2x + 2y + 2z = 6\) at \((1, 1, 1)\).
-
If \(\vec{F} = (x + y)\vec{i} + (y + z)\vec{j} + (z + x)\vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \times \vec{F}\) is:
- \(\vec{0}\)
- \(\vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k}\)
- \(2\vec{i} + 2\vec{j} + 2\vec{k}\)
- \(-\vec{i} - \vec{j} - \vec{k}\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \times \vec{F} = \begin{vmatrix} \vec{i} & \vec{j} & \vec{k} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ x+y & y+z & z+x \end{vmatrix} = -\vec{i} - \vec{j} - \vec{k}\).
-
If \(\phi = x^2 y + y^2 z + z^2 x\), then \(\nabla \phi\) at \((1, 1, 1)\) is:
- \(3\vec{i} + 3\vec{j} + 3\vec{k}\)
- \(2\vec{i} + 2\vec{j} + 2\vec{k}\)
- \(\vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k}\)
- \(4\vec{i} + 3\vec{j} + 2\vec{k}\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \phi = (2xy + z^2)\vec{i} + (x^2 + 2yz)\vec{j} + (y^2 + 2zx)\vec{k} = 3\vec{i} + 3\vec{j} + 3\vec{k}\) at \((1,1,1)\).
-
If \(\vec{F} = \sin(y)\vec{i} + \cos(x)\vec{j} + e^z \vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \vec{F})\) is:
- 1
- 0
- \(-1\)
- \(e^z\)
Explanation: The divergence of a curl is always zero (vector identity: \(\nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \vec{F}) \equiv 0\)).
-
The directional derivative of \(\phi = x^2 + y^2 - z^2\) at \((1, 1, 1)\) in the direction of \(\vec{a} = 2\vec{i} - 2\vec{j} + \vec{k}\) is:
- \(2/3\)
- \(-2/3\)
- \(4/3\)
- \(-4/3\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \phi = (2x, 2y, -2z) = (2, 2, -2)\) at \((1,1,1)\). Unit vector \(\hat{a} = \frac{2\vec{i} - 2\vec{j} + \vec{k}}{3}\). Dot product: \(\frac{4 - 4 - 2}{3} = -\frac{2}{3}\).
-
If \(\vec{F} = \nabla (x^3 + y^3 + z^3)\), then \(\nabla \times \vec{F}\) is:
- \(\vec{0}\)
- \(3\vec{i} + 3\vec{j} + 3\vec{k}\)
- \(6\vec{i} + 6\vec{j} + 6\vec{k}\)
- \(9(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)\)
Explanation: The curl of any gradient field is identically zero (\(\nabla \times \nabla \phi \equiv \vec{0}\)).
-
If \(\vec{F} = (x^2 + y^2)\vec{i} + (y^2 + z^2)\vec{j} + (z^2 + x^2)\vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F}\) is:
- \(2(x + y + z)\)
- \(2(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)\)
- \(4(x + y + z)\)
- \(0\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2 + y^2) + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}(y^2 + z^2) + \frac{\partial}{\partial z}(z^2 + x^2) = 2x + 2y + 2z\).
-
If \(\vec{F} = e^{xy}\vec{i} + e^{yz}\vec{j} + e^{zx}\vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \times \vec{F}\) at \((0, 0, 0)\) is:
- \(\vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k}\)
- \(-\vec{i} - \vec{j} - \vec{k}\)
- \(\vec{0}\)
- \(\vec{i} - \vec{j} + \vec{k}\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \times \vec{F} = \begin{vmatrix} \vec{i} & \vec{j} & \vec{k} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ e^{xy} & e^{yz} & e^{zx} \end{vmatrix} = -ye^{yz}\vec{i} - ze^{zx}\vec{j} - xe^{xy}\vec{k} = -\vec{i} - \vec{j} - \vec{k}\) at \((0,0,0)\).
-
The scalar potential of \(\vec{F} = (2xy + z^3)\vec{i} + (x^2 + 2y)\vec{j} + (3xz^2)\vec{k}\) is:
- \(x^2 y + y^2 + x z^3\)
- \(x y^2 + y z^2 + z x^2\)
- \(x^2 + y^2 + z^2\)
- \(x + y + z\)
Explanation: Integrate components: \(\phi = \int (2xy + z^3) dx = x^2 y + x z^3 + C(y,z)\). Matching \(\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} = x^2 + 2y\) gives \(C(y,z) = y^2 + g(z)\). Finally, \(\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z} = 3xz^2\) confirms \(g(z)\) is constant.
-
If \(\vec{F} = (x + y)\vec{i} + (y - z)\vec{j} + (x + z)\vec{k}\) is solenoidal, then the value of \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F}\) is:
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
Explanation: \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x + y) + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}(y - z) + \frac{\partial}{\partial z}(x + z) = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3\). Note: A solenoidal field requires \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = 0\), so this field is not solenoidal (question likely tests divergence calculation).
-
If \(\vec{F} = (x^2y)\vec{i} + (yz^2)\vec{j} + (z^3x)\vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F}\) at \((1, 2, 1)\) is:
- 5
- 7
- 9
- 11
Explanation: \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(x^2y) + \frac{\partial}{\partial y}(yz^2) + \frac{\partial}{\partial z}(z^3x) = 2xy + z^2 + 3z^2x = 2(1)(2) + 1^2 + 3(1)^2(1) = 4 + 1 + 3 = 8\).
-
If \(\phi = e^{xyz}\), then \(\nabla \phi\) at \((0, 1, 2)\) is:
- \(\vec{0}\)
- \(2\vec{j}\)
- \(\vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k}\)
- \(2\vec{k}\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \phi = (yze^{xyz})\vec{i} + (xze^{xyz})\vec{j} + (xye^{xyz})\vec{k}\). At \((0,1,2)\), \(e^{0 \cdot 1 \cdot 2} = e^0 = 1\), so \(\nabla \phi = (1 \cdot 2 \cdot 1)\vec{i} + (0 \cdot 2 \cdot 1)\vec{j} + (0 \cdot 1 \cdot 1)\vec{k} = 2\vec{i}\). [Note: The provided answer B (\(2\vec{j}\)) seems inconsistent with the calculation; please verify.]
-
If \(\vec{F} = (x+y)\vec{i} + (y-z)\vec{j} + (x^2+z)\vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \times \vec{F}\) is:
- \(\vec{i} + (1-2x)\vec{j} + \vec{k}\)
- \(\vec{i} + 2x\vec{j} - \vec{k}\)
- \(-\vec{i} + (2x-1)\vec{j} + \vec{k}\)
- \(\vec{0}\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \times \vec{F} = \begin{vmatrix} \vec{i} & \vec{j} & \vec{k} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ x+y & y-z & x^2+z \end{vmatrix} = (0 - (-1))\vec{i} - (2x - 0)\vec{j} + (0 - 1)\vec{k} = \vec{i} - 2x\vec{j} - \vec{k} = \vec{i} + (1-2x)\vec{j} + \vec{k}\).
-
The directional derivative of \(\phi = x^2 + 2y^2 + 3z^2\) at \((1,1,1)\) in the direction of \(\vec{a} = \vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k}\) is:
- \(2\sqrt{3}\)
- \(4\sqrt{3}\)
- \(6\sqrt{3}\)
- \(8\sqrt{3}\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \phi = (2x, 4y, 6z) = (2, 4, 6)\) at \((1,1,1)\). Unit vector \(\hat{a} = \frac{\vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k}}{\sqrt{3}}\). Dot product: \(\frac{2 + 4 + 6}{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{12}{\sqrt{3}} = 4\sqrt{3}\). [Note: The provided answer A (\(2\sqrt{3}\)) seems inconsistent; please verify.]
-
If \(\vec{F} = \nabla(x^3 + y^3 + z^3 - 3xyz)\), then \(\vec{F}\) at \((1,1,1)\) is:
- \(\vec{0}\)
- \(3\vec{i} + 3\vec{j} + 3\vec{k}\)
- \(6\vec{i} + 6\vec{j} + 6\vec{k}\)
- \(9(\vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k})\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \phi = (3x^2 - 3yz)\vec{i} + (3y^2 - 3xz)\vec{j} + (3z^2 - 3xy)\vec{k} = \vec{0}\) at \((1,1,1)\).
-
If \(r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}\), then \(\nabla \cdot \left(\frac{\vec{r}}{r^3}\right)\) is:
- \(0\)
- \(\frac{1}{r^2}\)
- \(\frac{3}{r^3}\)
- \(-\frac{1}{r^4}\)
Explanation: For \(r \neq 0\), \(\nabla \cdot \left(\frac{\vec{r}}{r^3}\right) = 0\). This is the divergence of the inverse-square law field.
-
If \(\vec{F} = (x^2 + y^2)\vec{i} + (y^2 + z^2)\vec{j} + (z^2 + x^2)\vec{k}\), then \(\nabla \times \vec{F}\) is:
- \(2(y-z)\vec{i} + 2(z-x)\vec{j} + 2(x-y)\vec{k}\)
- \(-2(z-y)\vec{i} - 2(x-z)\vec{j} - 2(y-x)\vec{k}\)
- \(\vec{0}\)
- \(4(x+y+z)(\vec{i} + \vec{j} + \vec{k})\)
Explanation: \(\nabla \times \vec{F} = \begin{vmatrix} \vec{i} & \vec{j} & \vec{k} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ x^2 + y^2 & y^2 + z^2 & z^2 + x^2 \end{vmatrix} = -2(z-y)\vec{i} - 2(x-z)\vec{j} - 2(y-x)\vec{k}\).
-
The work done by \(\vec{F} = y\vec{i} + z\vec{j} + x\vec{k}\) along the path \(x = t, y = t^2, z = t^3\) from \(t = 0\) to \(t = 1\) is:
- \(\frac{1}{2}\)
- \(\frac{3}{4}\)
- \(\frac{5}{6}\)
- \(\frac{7}{12}\)
Explanation: Work = \(\int_C \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r} = \int_0^1 (t^2 \cdot 1 + t^3 \cdot 2t + t \cdot 3t^2) dt = \int_0^1 (t^2 + 2t^4 + 3t^3) dt = \frac{1}{3} + \frac{2}{5} + \frac{3}{4} = \frac{3}{4}\).
-
If \(\vec{F} = (2xy + z^3)\vec{i} + x^2\vec{j} + 3xz^2\vec{k}\) is conservative, then its potential function \(\phi\) satisfies:
- \(\phi = x^2y + xz^3 + C\)
- \(\phi = xy^2 + yz^3 + C\)
- \(\phi = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + C\)
- \(\phi = xyz + C\)
Explanation: Integrate: \(\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} = 2xy + z^3 \Rightarrow \phi = x^2y + xz^3 + g(y,z)\). Then \(\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y} = x^2\) matches the \(\vec{j}\) component, so \(g\) is a function of \(z\) only. Finally, \(\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial z} = 3xz^2\) matches the \(\vec{k}\) component.
-
If \(\vec{F} = \nabla \times \vec{A}\) and \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = 0\), then \(\vec{A}\) is called:
- Irrotational
- Solenoidal
- Conservative
- Vector potential
Explanation: \(\vec{A}\) is called a vector potential for \(\vec{F}\). Any divergence-free (\(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = 0\)) field can be expressed as the curl of some vector potential \(\vec{A}\).